Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2022: Which sub-$400 phone is best?
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Which sub-$400 phone is all-time?
What's the secret recipe for the best cheap phone? Both Apple and Samsung seem to believe they've figured it out, releasing new similarly priced midrange handsets within days of each other. Notwithstanding, equally our Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020 face-off highlights, these devices take very different paths to achieve that depression cost.
- Samsung Galaxy A51 review
- iPhone SE 2020 review
- iPhone SE 2020 vs. Pixel 4a: Can Google have back the cheap telephone crown?
For the new iPhone SE 2020, it's a story almost premium performance in a pint-sized — and admittedly boring — package. The Samsung Milky way A51, on the other paw, is all about delivering a big screen and a modernistic design, albeit at the expense of a fast processor or infrequent camera quality.
Hither'due south how these 2 $399 phones stack up.
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Specs
| Model | Samsung Milky way A51 | iPhone SE |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $399 | $399 |
| Screen | 6.5-inch OLED (2400x1080) | 4.vii-inch LCD (1334x750) |
| CPU | Exynos 9611 | A13 Bionic |
| Storage | 128GB; expandable upwardly to 512GB | 64GB/128GB/256GB |
| Storage | 4GB | 3GB |
| Rear Camera | 48MP broad (ƒ/2.0), 12MP ultrawide (ƒ/2.2), 5MP depth (ƒ/2.2), 5MP macro (ƒ/2.four) | 12MP (ƒ/1.eight) |
| Front Camera | 32MP (ƒ/2.2) | 7MP (ƒ/ii.ii) |
| Colors | Prism Crush Black | Black, White, Product Reddish |
| Weight | 6.07 ounces | 5.ii ounces |
| Dimensions | 6.24 x ii.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.v x 2.seven ten 0.three inches |
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Pricing and carriers
Both the Galaxy A51 and iPhone SE cost $399 and are bachelor either unlocked or through most major and disbelieve carriers.
There's just 1 notable difference in terms of the price breakup, and it really works in Samsung's favor. The Galaxy A51 comes with 128GB of storage, which is quite generous these days when you consider some flagships still merely requite you half that unless you spend more (looking at you lot, Apple tree and Google). The iPhone SE, however, starts at $399 for a 64GB model, and you'll take to spend another $fifty if you want 128GB. That's not awful, though it's something iPhone buyers should be wary of.
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Design
These phones couldn't await more unlike. The Galaxy A51 is bigger than the iPhone SE in every dimension — it's nearly an inch taller, a third of an inch wider and 0.8 ounces heavier. For that, Samsung buyers become a much larger screen, too: a 6.5-inch console surrounded by extremely thin bezels, every bit opposed to the iPhone SE's cut-edge-for-2014 4.vii-inch i.
The Galaxy A51 also sports an in-display optical fingerprint sensor and a headphone jack, and you won't discover the latter three.5-millimeter port on any modern iPhone.
However, the iPhone SE has some advantages over the Milky way A51. Apple's phone may exist much smaller, only information technology'due south built from more high-grade materials, like metal and glass, rather than plastic like the A51. Information technology's rated IP67 h2o resistant, and supports Qi wireless charging, likewise.
The Milky way A51's design might exist more with the times, though it doesn't feel quite every bit premium. Ultimately, Samsung wins out here because it'south hard to imagine not feeling but a little cramped by Apple's 4.7-inch panel, only the gap isn't every bit wide equally you might assume.
Winner: Samsung Milky way A51
Samsung Milky way A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Display
One of the Galaxy A51's premier features has to exist its display. This 6.5-inch OLED screen delivers rich hues and deep blacks, and it's sheer size makes information technology much more immersive than the iPhone SE's iv.7-inch LCD console.
The differences in display technologies are important to note, too. The iPhone SE's screen can certainly become brighter, with a summit of 653 nits to the Galaxy A51's 353 nits. Only colors on the iPhone brandish look dull compared to those on Samsung'due south panel, because LCD screens lack the ability to turn pixels off in total darkness, or lucifer the saturation you lot get from OLED tech. Samsung likewise offers two display modes — Natural and Brilliant — for yous to tune the appearance of content to your liking, which Apple does non.
With the A51 tuned to Bright mode, it was able to render 212.two% of the sRGB color space, compared to the iPhone SE'south 111.2%. However, at that setting, the colors on the Samsung device are less accurate than those on the iPhone, every bit evidenced past the A51's Delta-E rating of 0.xxx to the iPhone SE's 0.20 (Numbers closer to goose egg are ameliorate.)
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Milky way A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Cameras
The Galaxy A51'south rear camera has four lenses to the iPhone SE's one. Ordinarily, y'all'd call back that puts Apple tree's handset at a disadvantage when it comes to photos — only never underestimate the power of one really adept photographic camera equally opposed to a handful of average ones.
The A51's 48-megapixel, ƒ/2.0 chief shooter tin can capture scenes that compare well with those from the iPhone SE's 12-megapixel, ƒ/1.8 lens, given the right conditions. Both phones deliver a striking corporeality of item in their respective photos of a tiki torch, simply the Galaxy'due south benefits from the shallow depth of field offered past Samsung's Live Focus way, likewise as the phone'due south five-MP depth sensor. The iPhone can only accept those kinds of portraits of people, not objects.
When light is less plentiful, however, the A51's photo quality falls off a cliff. These shots were taken at sunset, and the iPhone'south example delivers impressive particular and dramatic lighting, despite the relatively dim conditions. Samsung'due south phone, on the other paw, artificially ratchets up the ISO and exposure into the stratosphere, and pumps the magenta hues up to an cool degree. Even focusing was tricky for the A51; it repeatedly struggled to hone in on the institute, while the iPhone got itself dialed in relatively chop-chop.
Within, the A51 likewise turned in a blown-out, drab shot of some books atop my desk. The iPhone SE nailed the colors and produced a result that was sharper every bit well — something near clearly visible in the text on the graphic novel to the left.
The Galaxy A51 packs a 32MP selfie lens, compared to the iPhone SE's 8MP shooter. With 4 times the pixels, the A51 can certainly capture a more well-baked outcome, though I'd rather have the iPhone'southward portrait, for its slightly more natural color and better exposure of the sky against the trees in the background. Apple's camera produced a shot that was a flake too warm, but it'south nevertheless the one I'd rather share with no editing.
The Galaxy A51 has two other lenses we oasis't yet discussed: a 12MP ultrawide and a 5MP macro. The ultrawide shooter is overnice to accept, and probably the A51'south only real reward over the iPhone SE, because it enables you to shoot perspectives that manifestly aren't possible on Apple tree's device. The A51'southward macro lens is overnice too, though we found results from that camera to exist dim and defective in colour, and most buyers are less likely to become utilize out of it anyhow. Finally, the A51 also features a Night Way — a feature missing in action from the iPhone SE — though oftentimes in our testing it did more harm than proficient to low-light images shot past the A51.
Winner: iPhone SE
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Performance
Yous wouldn't expect this round to exist much of a contest and, well, it isn't. The iPhone SE's A13 Bionic bit is the very same 1 found in the iPhone eleven and iPhone 11 Pro, and unsurprisingly, it wipes the floor with Samsung's midrange Exynos 9611 CPU in the Galaxy A51.
The way the numbers compare is nigh laughable. Where the iPhone SE scored three,226 points in the system-wide Geekbench v test, all the Galaxy A51 could muster was a measly 1,293. And in 3DMark's Sling Shot Farthermost graphics test, where the iPhone SE scored iv,001 points, the A51 proved about half every bit powerful, with a score of just two,057.
You can feel the deviation in operation in regular apply, as well. Apps on the A51 sometimes take ii or 3 seconds to open; the camera app might hit a snag while switching modes; games don't expect as abrupt or run as fast; and scrolling or swiping animations are juddery when they should be smoothen. The iPhone SE suffers from none of these setbacks, and so the winner hither is clear as twenty-four hours.
Winner: iPhone SE
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Battery life and charging
The iPhone SE'south ane,821-mAh battery is less than half the size of the 4,000-mAh one within the Galaxy A51, and yet both phones performed almost identically in Tom's Guide's custom battery test.
The A51 surfed the spider web over LTE for nine hours and 16 minutes until it ran out of juice — only two minutes less than the iPhone SE, which ran for 9 hours and 18 minutes. The best phone battery life in our testing begins around the 11-hr mark, and then neither of those results are particularly encouraging.
Still, the difference in bombardment size means interesting things for charging. The iPhone SE comes with just a 5-watt brick, though information technology supports wireless charging besides and tin can be fast-charged using Apple's xviii-watt USB-C adapter, if you lot pick that up separately for $48 (factoring in the price of the brick and cable together). The Galaxy A51 comes with a 15-watt charger out of the box. Because of the way the numbers shake out, though, both phones exhibit roughly even accuse times, taking a half 60 minutes to get from completely dead to xxx% with their packaged adapters.
The iPhone SE narrowly wins out here for its wireless charging perk, though it's interesting how much efficiency Apple tree was able to extract from that tiny battery, likely cheers in large part to the SE's super-small screen.
Winner: iPhone SE
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Software and special features
Samsung intends to support the Galaxy A51 with two years of Android software updates and quarterly security patches. That'due south actually quite good for a budget phone, though Apple'southward track record is peerless in this regard. Cupertino still supports the original iPhone SE and iPhone 6S with new releases of iOS 13, which is the type of long-term support you rarely see in this industry — particularly if yous're talking about sub-$400 phones in item.
Samsung'south 1 UI implementation of Android 10 adds some helpful features, though we found Apple tree'southward latest edition of iOS to exist better, thanks to improvements to a number of apps, like Maps and Photos, Sign In with Apple for increased security, and a comprehensive Dark Style that touches more of the user interface.
There'south i expanse of the Galaxy A51 that could especially use some tuning in future editions of the phone, and that's Samsung'southward in-screen fingerprint sensor. The scanner embedded in the A51's display doesn't seem to be as fast or accurate as the ultrasonic one within the flagship Galaxy S20 serial, and it'due south especially sensitive to any moisture at all. If your hands are even slightly damp, your prints probably won't register. Meanwhile, because Apple tree's used an former-school capacitive sensor for Touch ID, the iPhone SE's scanner is less temperamental.
Winner: iPhone SE
Samsung Milky way A51 vs. iPhone SE 2020: Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A51 may accept a lot going for it, but the iPhone SE is simply a more practical purchase if you're in the market for a $400 phone.
The iPhone'due south operation is unrivaled, and its build quality is 2d to none — even if the pattern is stuck in yesterday. Its unmarried camera captures meliorate photos than the Galaxy A51's 4 rear shooters, especially in low light. And Apple tree's longstanding software support will give yous the peace of heed that your iPhone will get at least some of the latest features long into its lifespan.
| Model | Samsung Galaxy A51 | iPhone SE |
|---|---|---|
| Price and availability (10) | ix | 8 |
| Design (xv) | 13 | ten |
| Display (x) | ix | five |
| Photographic camera (20) | 13 | 18 |
| Performance (15) | 9 | 15 |
| Battery and charging (twenty) | 13 | 14 |
| Software (10) | 8 | 10 |
| Total (100) | 74 | 80 |
The A51 is harder to recommend over the iPhone SE, especially due to its lackluster processor. However, if the iPhone's tiny brandish only doesn't work for you, or you really want an OLED screen to bask games and movies, or a headphone jack to heed to music, Samsung's midrange Galaxy is a decent selection. For those with specific needs, information technology will be the right budget telephone. But right now, Apple'due south value is simply uncontested in this class; perhaps Google's Pixel 4a will fare amend when it arrives later this spring.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/face-off/samsung-galaxy-a51-vs-iphone-se-2020
Posted by: wilsonbacce1936.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy A51 vs. iPhone SE 2022: Which sub-$400 phone is best?"
Post a Comment